Comparison

Biological comparison

This compares mechanisms and evidence profiles. It is not a ranking, a recommendation, or a safety assessment.

Epigallocatechin gallate only

  • KEAP1-NFE2L2 antioxidant response
  • Degradation of the extracellular matrix

Shared pathways

  • No shared curated pathways

L-Ascorbic acid only

  • Collagen biosynthesis and modifying enzymes
  • Detoxification of reactive oxygen species
  • Melanin biosynthesis

Epigallocatechin gallate

C22H18O11 · Antioxidant

EGCG is the major green tea catechin, studied for antioxidant and UV-response biology mainly in cell and animal models.

Targets

  • Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9)inhibits (low confidence)
  • NF-E2-related factor 2 (NFE2L2)activates (low confidence)

L-Ascorbic acid

C6H8O6 · Antioxidant

L-ascorbic acid is vitamin C: a water-soluble reducing agent and an essential cofactor for the prolyl and lysyl hydroxylases that mature collagen.

Targets

  • Prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunit alpha-1 (P4HA1)activates (high confidence)
  • Procollagen-lysine 5-dioxygenase (PLOD1)activates (high confidence)
  • Tyrosinase (TYR)inhibits (low confidence)
  • Sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter 2 (SLC23A2)targets (medium confidence)

Evidence engine

Limited

Mostly mechanistic, animal or single-study evidence.

Skinceptor Evidence Index

38

experimental · of 100

This index is a research-navigation aid describing how much evidence exists and how it was produced. It is not a medical safety score, an efficacy guarantee, or a clinical recommendation.

Study composition

  • Human1
  • In-vitro1
Total studies
2
Human studies
1
Largest sample
16
Range
2007–2011

Index breakdown

  • Study design quality48% × 28%

    Mean design weight across curated studies (meta-analysis 1.0, RCT 0.9, other human 0.7, review 0.45, animal 0.35, in-vitro 0.25).

  • Human evidence share33% × 22%

    Proportion of curated evidence measured in people rather than cells or animals.

  • Evidence volume50% × 14%

    Log-scaled count of curated studies, so volume alone cannot dominate the score.

  • Largest sample size40% × 12%

    Log-scaled largest reported sample size across curated human studies.

  • Replication33% × 12%

    Independent human studies, capped at three; one study is never treated as replicated.

  • Recency25% × 7%

    Linear decay over a twenty-year window from the most recent curated publication.

  • Source traceability0% × 5%

    Share of curated studies with a verified PMID or DOI in this dataset.

How is this determined? →

Insufficient comparable evidence for quantitative synthesis.

Evidence engine

Moderate

Some human evidence exists, but replication or sample sizes are limited.

Skinceptor Evidence Index

58

experimental · of 100

This index is a research-navigation aid describing how much evidence exists and how it was produced. It is not a medical safety score, an efficacy guarantee, or a clinical recommendation.

Study composition

  • Human1
  • Randomised controlled trial1
  • In-vitro3
  • Review2
Total studies
7
Human studies
2
Largest sample
19
Range
1991–2020

Index breakdown

  • Study design quality46% × 28%

    Mean design weight across curated studies (meta-analysis 1.0, RCT 0.9, other human 0.7, review 0.45, animal 0.35, in-vitro 0.25).

  • Human evidence share57% × 22%

    Proportion of curated evidence measured in people rather than cells or animals.

  • Evidence volume95% × 14%

    Log-scaled count of curated studies, so volume alone cannot dominate the score.

  • Largest sample size43% × 12%

    Log-scaled largest reported sample size across curated human studies.

  • Replication67% × 12%

    Independent human studies, capped at three; one study is never treated as replicated.

  • Recency70% × 7%

    Linear decay over a twenty-year window from the most recent curated publication.

  • Source traceability14% × 5%

    Share of curated studies with a verified PMID or DOI in this dataset.

How is this determined? →

Insufficient comparable evidence for quantitative synthesis.